Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryn Lucas
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 14:44, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Bryn Lucas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find any reliable third party sources for an article on Bryn Lucas - "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." Pesky (talk …stalk!) 03:25, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I couldn't find any reliable sources (WP:GNG). Fails WP:CREATIVE. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 06:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Mentioned in a couple of newspaper articles but does not pass WP:ARTIST. Heywoodg 08:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While sources can be found to confirm his acting roles, his brief career fails WP:ENT. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Two supporting roles in straight-to-video movies and a guest spot on a TV show do not equal WP:NACTOR notability. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 22:02, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.