Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Char Vinnedge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Luv'd Ones and delete history per consensus. If anybody thinks there's anything here worth merging let me know. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:56, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Char Vinnedge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable whether this person meets WP:MUSICBIO. Article on band has notability issues as well. PROD removed by author without explanation. Singularity42 (talk) 20:04, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - An interesting person, and perhaps somebody ahead of her time, but there is not substantia coverage about her. Work on Nitro Function is verifiable; even in Polish. There is coverage in blogs but even the blog coverage indicates that Vinnedge and her band didn't receive a lot of notice. -- Whpq (talk) 13:59, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment From the author... I have to appologise for removing the "PROD". I did not know what it was as this is my first wiki article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.241.7 (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing wrong with removing a PROD - it just signifies that the deletion of the article is contested, and hence this discussion to come to a consensus. Singularity42 (talk) 19:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per Whpq. Does not meet notability criteria.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I added some facts that should help for notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charzach64 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable, but there's nothing here in the way of sources to do so. —C.Fred (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Ok, I will add the sources this soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charzach64 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to the Luv'd Ones, a band that I will give the benefit of the doubt. I added what I could find, which isn't much--certainly not enough for me to vote keep. Drmies (talk) 05:01, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.