Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlene McMann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Cirt (talk) 00:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charlene McMann

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for non-notable "cancer patient advocate". —Chowbok ☠ 20:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Two dead links backing up the money line that this is somehow a "Chicago Woman of the Year." Worth further investigation, but I can appreciate the righteousness of the challenge. Carrite (talk) 01:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Wikipedia treats athletes and porn stars too easily and philanthropists too harshly. I'm impressed enough with [CHICAGO BLOOD CANCER-DOT-ORG] indicating that Ms. McMann is its founder to say that this one should be given the benefit of the doubt as a KEEP + IMPROVE. Carrite (talk) 01:12, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep One source that profiles her is the local NBC news station. That should be good enough. Borock (talk) 02:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets minimum standards of notability. - Davodd (talk) 07:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.