Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Stuart (still life artist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:39, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Stuart (still life artist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very confusing article, it appears he does not meet WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 11:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Article is poorly written, but the subject has been covered in reliable sources and meets the threshold of notability. Kindzmarauli (talk) 14:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where are those reliable sources? I only see one book in the references which is not written about this artist. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 14:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 04:15, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't find any reliable resources. Doesn't appear in art reference materials. LaMona (talk) 22:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless more material can be found. DGG ( talk ) 01:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.