Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Freak (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pretzel Logic. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:16, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Freak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is non-notable. "Charlie Freak" is no more well-known than any of the dozens of other songs in Steely Dan's recorded output. Furthermore, though the article has been in existence for over five years, it has no true content. The first paragraph consists of info from Pretzel Logic, and the second paragraph simply summarizes the song's lyrics. I reviewed the article's history for possible vandalism but found nothing. It never had any real content, and given the song's lack of notability, it is unlikely that it ever will, due to lack of mentions in third party sources. Martin IIIa (talk) 02:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pretzel Logic. This song article is just fan trivia about the lyrics, and non-encyclopedic. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:33, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pretzel Logic. The nom makes all the relevant points. The song does not appear to pass muster at WP:NSONG. Googling the song reveals the usual assortment of lyric sites and Youtube videos. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 03:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pretzel Logic as is the standard for non-notable songs. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:55, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I hadn't realized that merging was the standard for non-notable songs. Thanks for mentioning that. Now if I find any other articles like this, I'll know to take them to a merger discussion instead.--Martin IIIa (talk) 14:13, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.