Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave's Farm (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dave's Farm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notablility, he is not notable outside of Youtube apart from a (minor) WP:BLP1E event where his farm was raided for environmental reasons. Article appears to be written by a fan, and several IPs have tried adding material inappropriate to WP:BLP, without reliable sources. Martin451 (talk) 00:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article has already been deleted before in an AfD. Martin451 (talk) 00:13, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- However (a) this content is not identical to the previously deleted content from 2007, and (b) the arguments in the prior AFD discussion in 2007 about non-Youtube sources clearly don't apply now. Uncle G (talk) 00:39, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable YouTuber, he doesn't even have awards. Jeremjay 24 00:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems pretty non-notable to me. I should mention that I raised the BLP issues at the BLP noticeboard. The fact that the article about this relatively non-notable figure is also, it seems, going to become a magnet for BLP concerns tips the balance for me. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 03:44, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Made it more than once to the top Youtube's video page and traditional media reported as well. Falls roughly into the same category as Chris Crocker (Internet celebrity). - 83.254.210.47 (talk) 08:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This guy is no Lisa Nova or iJustine. Although I know that his pedophile accusations are true (there is a mountain of evidence and observations to prove it, just visit This forum, I don't see how the guy will be notable until his "farm" is raided and he is arrested, as I can see the case getting lots of attention when the guy is brought down. Karrmann (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.