Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Is a Bitch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. AFD is not cleanup, even the nominator appears to believe this article can be improved to an acceptable standard. There is no deadline, if it can be improved, we keep it. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Death Is a Bitch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All plot except for the mention of one review. Not a notable episode JDDJS (talk) 22:00, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If you're going to nominate this episode, why not almost every other episode as well? The one's directly adjacent to this one are in similar condition, for example. DP76764 (Talk) 22:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, but I don't know how to combine multiple AFDs into one. If you know how to, feel free to do so. And by almost every other episode, I assume you're only talking about the ones from this season, as the ones from the latter seasons are actually in very good shape with most of them being Good Articles or at least B-Class. JDDJS (talk) 22:50, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't usually do any deleting, so have no idea how to do that. In terms of this delete, I'd actually prefer some reference improvement and keeping of the article(s) over deletion. DP76764 (Talk) 23:09, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer improvement too, but it is rare for editors who have the skill and time to make good episode articles to work on the episodes from the early seasons. JDDJS (talk) 00:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I actually remember this being quite a notable episode. It was a rare sighting of Norm MacDonald and quite a celebrity guest star for the show's obscure first run. --Qwerty0 (talk) 15:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't say anything about that in the article. Feel free to add it. JDDJS (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Contrary to the earlier statement made that it is "rare for editors who have the skill and time to make good episode articles to work on the episodes from the early seasons." The article can be easilly improved, even by yourself. I will attempt to improve the article as well. Gage (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So prove me wrong and improve it. If you do, I'll gladly close this AFD. I would love to improve the article myself, but I know that I am not a very good writer. JDDJS (talk) 19:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep An article that needs to be improved is not an excuse for deletion. 08:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.77.248.99 (talk)
Redirect to Family Guy (season 2) if the article can't be kept. ----DanTD (talk) 01:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.