Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhuni (Meher Baba)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dhuni. There seems to be a consensus among all participants that a merge can be done. I have moved only the referenced sentences of Dhuni (Meher Baba) to Dhuni and am closing this. Further discussions pertaining to how much of the article must be merged should take place in the appropriate talk page. (non-admin closure) — F R ⁺ 05:22, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dhuni (Meher Baba)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I fail to see an iota of notability of the subject and non-trivial significant coverage about it, except in the biographical hagiography of Meher Baba and self-sources.Notability isn't inherited.

Part of a walled garden around Meher Baba.Nukable mess.

This t/p thread may provide some nackgound aspects on the issue. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 05:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 05:33, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge This article could easily be merged with the Dhuni article, as there is already a section on the use among Sai Baba followers. It could be a new section there on Baba's use. These are not the same as the Hindu use of the ritual, mean something different, and done differently. The only thing they share is fire and a name. I would be willing to help with the merging if that is what is decided. Dazedbythebell (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Dhuni per Dazedbythebell. There is usefull information for Wikipedia to keep though not as a separate article. Hoverfish Talk 14:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: Whether a full-content or a selective paste merger is performed, I am not voting here for a merge "of a few lines" only. Hoverfish Talk 10:46, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment--Hmm..... A merge of a few lines ought be nice enough:) ~ Winged Blades^Godric 08:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.