Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duluth mid air collision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Duluth mid air collision

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:AIRCRASH. Accident not involving anyone notable. WP:NOTNEWS also applies. ...William 13:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions....William 13:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions....William 13:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions....William 13:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Right now only in the news further than a day for the gaudy amount of money NBC News paid for the video, which does not establish notability. Otherwise a normal small airplane crash with no fatalities. Nate • (chatter) 20:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Notability zero.--Petebutt (talk) 01:42, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:EVENTCRIT. Miniapolis 03:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Maybe at some point it will become clear that this was a historic event for some reason or another that we are still too close to see. As of right now, this is a WP:NOTNEWS deletion, to my mind. Carrite (talk) 04:52, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia:AIRCRASH suggests light aircraft accidents are generally non-notable. Although this was an unusual and interesting crash it doesn't currently have evidence of enduring notability: there was a brief flurry of "this is neat!" news stories but it's missing the wider, long-term coverage to go beyond WP:NOTNEWS. Any possible merge candidates? --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:30, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this event is pretty clearly non-notable. Light aircraft crash, no fatalities, no prospect of any enduring significance of this event. It's ironic that Martin451's boomerang post at AN/I will ensure that this AfD gets a lot more attention and hence more delete !votes. 205.166.218.65 (talk) 13:25, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions....William 14:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOTNEWS JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:52, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:XBALL. While there might be some important policy outcome from this accident, it's just too soon to tell if it's significant. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 08:45, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable in the world-encyclopedia scheme of things (granted, it was notable for those involved), WP:NOTNEWS ES &L 09:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.