Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elissa Brent Weissman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 00:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elissa Brent Weissman

Notability concerns. Also, WP:NOT (crystal ball clause). Quantumobserver (talk) 03:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the article there is no mention of a crystal ball. I believe that two published novels by Penguin and Simon and Schuster indicate notability. Obviously we have different views on this. What do you think would make it more notable? Clearly this is a first edit of a page and who's to say that more people don't have additional material to add...the article has to start somewhere.Volatility (talk) 04:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are no published novels, not yet. Not being an author of established popularity, it's impossible to tell if the books will be notable in advance. It's the nature of publishing that most first novels by new authors are not a success, and not notable, and I see no reason at all to assume otherwise.DGG (talk) 06:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: notability not established. JamesBurns (talk) 06:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The books have not yet been released, so it's too early to have an article. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:CREATIVE. Schuym1 (talk) 23:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.