Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emeka Esogbue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:13, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emeka Esogbue

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see how the subject of this article passes WP:GNG. He's not published in reliable and independent sources, no significant work. Article was also created by Emekaesogbue which is a clear conflict of interest and heavily edited by Overcomers Child. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:36, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:36, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Journalism. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:06, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: marginal case, I found some mentions in generally reliable Nigerian media, but nothing I would consider really significant coverage. Falls just short of meeting WP:GNG. Given the possible COI, however, I would say that WP:TNT applies and the article should be deleted, with no prejudice against recreation if the coverage in reliable sources improves. —Ganesha811 (talk) 13:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.