Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ensafer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ensafer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another Cloud storage service amongst many others. Shirt58 (talk) 15:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or suggest it be userified by creator User talk:Jvrosnes? I would cite Wikipedia:Too soon although that page only explicitly uses entertainment subjects, it usually applies to these articles promoting new companies, which might be "two kids and an app" or might be "the next big thing". See also Wikipedia:Up and coming next big thing Only way to tell is wait until the products either become notable, or the company runs it course and fades away as most do. Not notable yet. W Nowicki (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although the references in the article provide some coverage of this as a start-up proposition, there is insufficient evidence of attained notability at this point. AllyD (talk) 06:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.