Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Sprott
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 05:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Eric Sprott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested Prod: Notability not established, doesn't appear to be anyone other than a investment manager. Sounds more like a CV The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 00:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --Ozgod (talk) 01:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Tag it to wikify The article is written poorly so far -- I agree. Notability? -- School of Business in Carleton University in Ottawa is named after Sprott. I guess such recognition is quite notable. Cheers, Lamro (talk) 04:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Having work in University, It usually means he donated money to have it built. There is a reason Schermerhorn halll is devoted to Anthropology department at Columbia University instead of it being called Boas Hall. The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 04:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As I said in my prod edit, it's little more than a CV and while that may no in itself be a reason to delete, there's no evidence that it can be expanded into a real article and that is a reason to delete. RxS (talk) 20:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Deletion will orphan other articles. Cheers, Lamro (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Is that a thing? Is that a reason to keep an article that would otherwise be deleted? RxS (talk) 04:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Why it would be deleted otherwise? It will be rewritten and updated with time. The initial reason was notability. My argument: naming a business school after this guy is quite notable an event. In US and Canada, there are overall about 25 such "named" b-schools, to the best of my knowledge. Lamro (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see how a donation of 10 million dollars in this case makes someone notable. That's the only reason for the renaming. It's not a notable event at all, schools are named after people all the time, if that's the only claim to notability it's not enough. RxS (talk) 18:05, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There are other notabilities mentioned in the article, plus other articles within the wiki, linking to the article in question. I ask to tag the article "wikify". Deletion is too drastic a measure. The article lives less than a year, it's simply too young to die. Spare it some time for improvement. With best wishes, Lamro (talk) 12:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see how a donation of 10 million dollars in this case makes someone notable. That's the only reason for the renaming. It's not a notable event at all, schools are named after people all the time, if that's the only claim to notability it's not enough. RxS (talk) 18:05, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Why it would be deleted otherwise? It will be rewritten and updated with time. The initial reason was notability. My argument: naming a business school after this guy is quite notable an event. In US and Canada, there are overall about 25 such "named" b-schools, to the best of my knowledge. Lamro (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Is that a thing? Is that a reason to keep an article that would otherwise be deleted? RxS (talk) 04:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Deletion will orphan other articles. Cheers, Lamro (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 22:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.