Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EuroVoice
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 05:27, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- EuroVoice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I tried to fix this, but to me it seems that this contest fails notability guidelines, is written as an advertisement, is largely unsourced, in bad English, with peacockery and on top of that is partly a copyvio from: http://eurovoice.tv/about/ noclador (talk) 07:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Looking at this, it seems the event was attended by at least hundreds, and was hosted by Pamela Anderson. Plus it has a neat little website too. I think the lack of sources is down to lack of English media coverage. It's poorly written, and any copyvio should be removed, advertising language should be edited out, but it shouldn't be deleted. - Yk3 talk · contrib 07:48, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Obvious keep though needs to be rewritten. Copyvio needs to go of course. I watched EuroVoice as did millions others, it wasn't very good but it's certainly notable enough to warrant an article on Wikipedia. The show returns this year and they're already accepting entries. --Tris2000 (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.