Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Tennessee Plaza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

First Tennessee Plaza

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

First Tennessee Plaza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Does not have coverage that meets significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV and article makes no claim that there is historic, social, economic, or architectural importance. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings.   // Timothy :: talk  14:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete The coverage in the article seems to be extremely trivial and I couldn't find anything about it that wasn't. There's hardly even the usual trivial news stories these things sometimes get. There does seem to be some trivial mentions in a few law books about it though, but those don't work for notability either. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.