Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluttershy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of My Little Pony characters#Pegasus Ponies. Clear consensus has developed DGG ( talk ) 02:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fluttershy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating myself for deletion because I don't really have a lot of sources to justify myself having a independent article. Flutter shy !xmcuvg2MH 02:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to say it Fluttershy, but I think you're right. Redirect to My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic. Master&Expert (Talk) 05:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Jclemens. Master&Expert (Talk) 10:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OPPOSED. You're just too bored on expanding things.Blackgaia02 (Talk if you're Worthy) (talk) 12:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the existing entry at List of My Little Pony characters#Pegasus Ponies. Jclemens (talk) 02:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Jclemens. --Legis (talk - contribs) 03:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed with Jclemens, Merge. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:40, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, because the other main (mane) characters from this show have their own articles now, and they can be improved. This show is only going to grow in popularity. I just discovered these articles, and I'm doing a few things to spruce them up. (IMDb links, coloring the infoboxes...) dogman15 (talk) 04:52, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. They can be improved over time. - XX55XX (talk) 14:35, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It needs expansion, but yes, it deserves to be kept.XTUX345 (talk) 19:42, 14 December 2011 (UTC)— XTUX345 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Merge to List of My Little Pony characters#Pegasus Ponies as per above. Ncboy2010 (talk) 05:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per above suggestions. Keep !votes boil down to WP:OSE and WP:ILIKEIT arguments. No independent coverage of the character. But +10 intarwebz to the nom for AfD nom-text of the month! Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 17:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per dogman SalfEnergy 23:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's too bad that Fluttershy became the scapegoat for discussion of deletion, and none of the other characters did. Poor Fluttershy! dogman15 (talk) 03:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of MLP character articles follow the same style of editing as this one, and the result of this discussion will influence my decision to nominate the others if necessary. Flutter shy !xmcuvg2MH 12:36, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Jclemens and Livitup. Fluttershy may be my favourite pony, but there is nothing in the article that indicates the subject meets WP:N. What is needed is high-quality sources independent of the subject that gives out-of-universe information. A few details about FIM role just doesn't cut the mustard. The show may be notable, but Fluttershy is not. The same holds true for the other FIM character articles I have seen. Melicans (talk, contributions) 14:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OR Redirect via Reversion it looks like the original version from April was a redirect to List of My Little Pony characters#Fluttershy. It was fine like this until December 9 when User:XX55XX changed the redirect into an article. I propose that rather than delete the page, if this is not worthy of an article it simply be reverted back to its original redirect form. 174.115.134.108 (talk) 00:30, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.