Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Bingham Rollins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:14, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

George Bingham Rollins

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Several of his relatives are notable, but I don't think this fellow is. There's a bunch of passing mentions to him owning a painting by George Caleb Bingham, but none of them that I've seen rise to significant coverage. https://www.google.com/books/edition/B%C4%93ta_Th%C4%93ta_P%C4%AB/1tbx9mDsrAoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22george+bingham+rollins%22&pg=PA398&printsec=frontcover We've got this short obit here published by an organization he was part of], but not much more. His death via falling into a well gained a bit of coverage at the time because his family was so prominent, but WP:NOTINHERITED applies and I don't think he meets WP:GNG on his own. Hog Farm _Talk 06:31, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Missouri. Hog Farm _Talk 06:31, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He fails to meet WP:GNG. I am aware the following carries no weight but… I am knowledgeable about sources on the Rollins family and don’t know of any that cover him in depth. He is admittedly locally important, but did not rise to the prominence necessary to garner significant coverage as defined by Wikipedia imo. If a full biography is ever published, we can consider recreation then. Grey Wanderer (talk) 14:47, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is all I find and it's a passing mention [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 00:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, couldn't find sufficient sources to pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 22:35, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:50, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.