Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goth Angel Sinner

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2022 August 6.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Goth Angel Sinner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fairly unremarkable release. Limited coverage does not satisfy WP:NALBUMS or WP:NSONGS. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 15:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 15:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Lil Peep discography. Change to keep per found sources below —VersaceSpace 🌃 16:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this release has plenty of third party, significant/dedicated coverage out there:

Again this doesn't say much beyond the EP's release.

https://www.nme.com/news/music/listen-lil-peeps-latest-posthumous-ep-goth-angel-sinner-2563014

This is an unremarkable mention - it's not WP:SIGCOV

Largely a passing mentiojn, not WP:SIGCOV

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/lil-peep-goth-angel-sinner-ep-when-i-lie-video-906094/

All are reliable per WP:RSMUSIC. And there's more out there too. Pretty easily meets the GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 19:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sergecross73 and SBKSPP The problem is a lot of these sources cover the same information (from a Press-release), with the same quotes and speak of the existence of the EP but not enough information to satisfy significant coverage. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a problem as far as the GNG goes, and even if it was, there's at least 1 review, and 1 preview type source. There's enough. Sergecross73 msg me 23:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:NSONG with sources presented by Sergecross. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 03:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.