Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HotBasic (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDY DELETE. Alexf(talk) 20:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- HotBasic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I hereby demand that the HotBasic Wiki article, which I mostly wrote, and in agreement with fnoware, who wrote the initial skeleton, be removed completely and immediately from Wiki, which has showed itself to be an unreliable source of information on the subject, and in general, unable to follow its own stated policies. Should Wiki persist in posting material about HotBasic, I shall have to investigate what legal remedies I may have against Wiki. (HotBasic (talk) 17:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Non- notable, No reliable sources, COI, article created by programme author, 3rd nomination for deletion. 1st nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HotBasic, 2nd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HotBasic (2nd nomination) Jezhotwells (talk) 01:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC) I should add WP:PROD removed by User:HotBasic Jezhotwells (talk) 02:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WikiProject Programming languages has been informed of this ongoing discussion. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete Way too much self-promoted technology is on Wikipedia! Miami33139 (talk) 02:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In fact, Speedy delete as recreation of deleted material. This has been AfD'd independently twice and deleted twice. This guy needs to bring something new to the table or go away. Miami33139 (talk) 02:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - The author lives in his own world and distorts facts to his own way of thinking. Folks are just wasting their time trying to correct this article as the author will fight with you every step of the way. If the guy goes by Dr. Electron, has imaginary friends (HotBabe and Maj. Hogg) and a website that uses the word hot in every sentence, the chances of obtaining a factual page is slim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.255.86 (talk) 04:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.