Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Important-Webhosting-Factors-to-Chose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 06:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Important-Webhosting-Factors-to-Chose

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by page creator ~~with no explanation~~. Unsourced essay, WP:NOTHOWTO TheLongTone (talk) 11:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Just an essay. Mangoe (talk) 12:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Wikipedia is not a place for how-to guides. No material here which is not already covered in depth at Website, Domain name, etc. AllyD (talk)
Delete: Wikipedia is not manual. - Vatsan34 (talk) 16:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, maybe useful somewhere, but not on Wikipedia. SchreiberBike talk 20:53, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems like reasonable advice, but it's not appropriate for Wikipedia. Better suited to a blog entry or Yahoo! Answers. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unreferenced/OR article, either essay or howto, in any case, as above, not appropriate content for wikipedia article.Dialectric (talk) 01:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTHOW and WP:NOTESSAY. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:59, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.