Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inhume (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ~ mazca ^talk 19:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inhume (band)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy WP:BAND. There aren't any reliable second party sources to establish the notability of the band. The article has been tagged with notability and no sources maintenance tags since August 2015. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 13:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Just after some more digging, I've found two Allmusic pages that I did not see during my initial search. ([1],[2]) I'm still not sure about the notability though. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 13:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Here are several sources:
Metal Music Archives Biography
An Interview with the Band
2010 Album Review in German
2007 Album Review in German
2018 Compilation Album Review
Another Interview with the Band
Inhume to Release 25th Anniversary Collection in December - Metal Jacket Magazine

With these and the Allmusic biography / album review, the page can be kept in my opinion. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 14:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per reliable sources coverage such as AllMusic staff written bio and album review as well as coverage in reliable German music sources such as metal.de and others that show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.