Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irene Marie Models

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 23:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irene Marie Models

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A modelling agency that is no longer operating. Notability seems to rely on some of the models represented by the agency and the agency's owner but notability is not inherited. The sources advocate more for the owner rather than the agency although some are unavailable to me in Europe. Searches revealed almost nothing, but again that may be an issue with EU/ USA internet rules. Appears to fail WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment, Companies, Fashion, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 4 hits in gnews, none of them indepth. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 04:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. None of their models were called supermodels, and even if, arguendo that representing the future FLOTUS counts, we need significant coverage about the agency. Bearian (talk) 14:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. I can't find evidence of coverage about the agency. Contributor892z (talk) 17:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.