Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerson Sapida

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 02:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jerson Sapida

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 03:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Why do you say such a ugly comment about the guy who made NBA 2K great? He has many reliable sources, you need to research some more.

Here are the reliable and independent sources:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] This is evidence that he is notable! Maude~Duggel (talk) 12:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - There is nothing ugly about the comment. It is a statement of fact in regards to Wikipedia based notability. Unfortunately the "references" you provided are single line mentions or 404s and do little to add to notability. reddogsix (talk) 13:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This editor has been creating a string of non-notable articles. [13] Natureium (talk) 14:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In fairness, I think the creator is doing good work, but still needs to learn what notability means in the context of Wikipedia. It doesn't mean fame, an it doesn't mean exposure by virtue of a name being mentioned in multiple places. We need significant coverage, and that's what's been lacking in the creator's contributions, for the most part. This is an encyclopedia, so articles we have should be a record of human knowledge. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The creator should have left this in draft space and worked on it there. This isn't a mainspace-ready article. I just removed about 15 redundant citations that were nothing more than trivial mentions, quotes, interviews, or otherwise primary sources. What's left seems to be more of the same. I am not seeing evidence of meeting WP:GNG or even Wikipedia:Notability (people). ~Anachronist (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep because he is notable just for 2K Sports! Maude~Duggel (talk) 20:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Wikipedia based notability is defined in WP:N and WP:GNC. Please show us how the article subject meets the criteria needed to establish Wikipedia based notability needed for inclusion into Wikipedia.reddogsix (talk) 21:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Maude~Duggel: No, he isn't notable for 2K Sports. Please be aware that notability is not inherited.
You're new here, you created this and several other articles that have been deleted for similar problems, I've moved one or two of yours to draft space for you to prevent their deletion while you work on improving them. You started this article in draft space and moved it into main space before it was ready, apparently before you have learned the English Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. A main space article must meet WP:GNG at a minimum. See Wikipedia:Golden rule for a brief overview of what is expected for main-space articles. Your articles haven't met the basic requirement of having significant coverage by reliable sources that are independent of the subject. You included a bunch of sources. Not all reliable sources are independent (like interviews), and not all independent sources are reliable (like blogs and some niche publications). None of your sources meet all three requirements of being reliable, independent, and having significant coverage of the subject. Passing mentions don't work. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Speedy keep~~ but he is one of the greatest Filipinos ever lived! Please take the deletion tag off and his article will be more expanded with other information about him! Thank you. Maude~Duggel (talk) 03:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Maude~Duggel: You don't get to vote more than once, so your 'speedy keep' has been struck. You are also ignoring the advice given. You have 6 days, plenty of time, to make improvements before this discussion is closed. And, you haven't offered any 'keep' arguments based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Unsubstantiated assertions about the subject's fame or greatness, and begging to stop the debate, aren't arguments for keeping the article. We need evidence, not WP:ILIKEIT statements. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources were not notable Thegooduser Let's Chat 01:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable video game producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. The creator really needs to stop creating new pages here until they learn wikipedia policy. I've dealt with at least two other hopeless pages in AfC they made. Legacypac (talk) 13:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet notability requirements. Brad v 04:50, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.