Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Northey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 11:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Northey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Fails WP:BIO. Reads like an advertisement with little supporting articles from third party sources that are not press release or non notable and blog like in nature. Fivestarfluff (talk) 16:04, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Care to provide a reason for deletion? hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 15:52, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep No reason for deletion. Withdrawn --GSK ● ✉ ✓ 16:04, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 20. Snotbot t • c » 16:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Internet presence / popularity doesn't render anyone notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia.HillbillyGoat (talk) 22:28, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP - I would say the fact that FORBES has listed her as one of the most influential/powerful in her field, lends credibility and inclusion. Jackryan733 (talk) 06:53, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note:This is creator. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 04:11, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK, and WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 07:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 19:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only source I could find was this which is not enough for WP:GNG. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 04:11, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.