Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Magnuson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No reason to keep the subject that is enshrined in policy or an established guideline has been provided, so despite the very limited input (that was not helped by relisting), I am yielding to the in-depth analysis of LaMona with a nod to the deletion of the subject in 2010 per AFD process. KaisaL (talk) 02:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joel Magnuson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet any of the criteria at WP:ACADEMIC. LK (talk) 04:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

keep Tho it is not a formal criterion, the extent of library holdigs of his books shows he;s influential. DGG ( talk ) 08:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:25, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete In spite of his library holdings, I was only able to find one review, in Publisher's Weekly, for any of his books (which I added). Not even Kirkus or Library Journal, so it isn't clear how his books got into libraries. (Note, his Amazon page shows an LJ review blurb, but I cannot find it on LJ itself, and there's no real citation to follow). The publisher of both of his books is 7 Stories Press, a small publisher. On his Amazon page he is listed as being an "independent economist" and "visiting fellow at the Ashcroft International Business School at Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge, England,..., and is on the faculty at the East West Sanctuary in Nagykovácsi, Hungary." His book "Mindfulness" has all of 12 cites, some of which look fring-y. So I'm not seeing WP:ACADEMICS and I also don't get WP:AUTHOR from this. It also says that he "specializ[es] in non-orthodox approaches to political economy", so I'm wondering if what we have here isn't WP:FRINGE. Again, I can't explain the library holdings, which seem high, especially in light of the small press and lack of reviews. LaMona (talk) 00:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.