Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimono (My Little Pony)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Kimono (My Little Pony) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is part of a barrage of mediocre My Little Pony character articles which are supported by fansites as sources and there aren't reliable third person sources to support notability therefore it should be deleted. Dwanyewest (talk) 04:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or redirect to List of My Little Pony characters. There's absolutely no reason to have an article for this pony. The character already has a mention on the MLP character page and that's all that really is needed. There's nothing to show that this character is notable outside of the franchise.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Delete. Unsourced. No indication of notability. --DAJF (talk) 16:34, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is significant coverage in reliable third party sources and the subject fails the notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if all the other pony articles are gone I don't see why this one should stay. SalfEnergy 15:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't recommend a redirect. I also recommend explaining to the MLP fans that you cannot go into excessive detail about every character on a show on wikipedia. You have fan wikis for that. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 08:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.