Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kipkay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 23:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kipkay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable tinkerer and internet "guru". Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I cannot find any reliable sources which would support his claims of notability. Crafty (talk) 13:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak weak weak keep He is somewhat notable as an online gimmick, but if the trail goes for delete I will go with them. He seems sort of like a modern version of those old traveling salesmen sort of gimmicks, but my concern is they are not very encyclopedic. --WngLdr34 (talk) 13:36, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Kipkay[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:Here we go again - Wikipedia, the cheapest billboard in the web.--SonicRay (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.