Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolodong, New South Wales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 14:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kolodong, New South Wales

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not between Taree..., this place is part of Taree, New South Wales and such content as there is may be moved to that article (with a redirect, of course) Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 12:53, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've found evidence of property being sold with suburb called Kolodong [1] , + it once had its own rail station. [2] this is a location in its own right. LibStar (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per LibStar. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.