Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LayerX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 20:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LayerX

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, only sourcing is confirmation of funding and routine business activities. Gsearch is straight into their company's website, nothing in Gnews Oaktree b (talk) 17:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Israel. Oaktree b (talk) 17:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I removed a pile of promotional links, self-links, links that didn't back the claims, non-RS links and one that I think was AI-generated. No evidence this company passes WP:NCORP - David Gerard (talk) 17:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails NCORP. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 18:10, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article on a start-up company with a similarly-named browser security product. Considered as a company, the available coverage concerns funding and a recent survey sponsored by the firm [1], both of which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Considered as a product, the brief coverage in overviews of new browser security products seems some way short of demonstrating attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:TOOSOON. (If this company achieves notability in the future, however, then the page could be recreated.)TH1980 (talk) 04:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NCORP. Mooonswimmer 02:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Usually startups fail NCORP. Usually implies that exceptions exist. Occasionally there is a startup that is the talk of all media. I do not see that here. gidonb (talk) 15:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails GNG and SIGCOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TandyTRS80 (talk • contribs) 08:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the sources meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability and I am unable to locate any that does. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.