Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los mojarras
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep The book sources identified by User:frankieMR and those added by other editors since deletion indicate that the group is notable beyond Peru. Mandsford 18:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Los mojarras (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem that notable. All I can see on Google is Blogspot, Facebook and YouTube. Who needs names? (talk) 07:26, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you checked to see if those sources already in the article are notable? Are there any sources in Spanish? Sven Manguard Wha? 07:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: this is perfectly notable, just you are searching google in the wrong language. We need to keep the page, but it needs a wikification added to it and its broken English needs improving. It also needs a band template and photo added and filled out. It also needs to be redirected to a page with proper capitalization and the redirect article removed. User talk:Pingu.dbl96 —Preceding undated comment added 10:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I was able to find several sources in books and news, ranging from incidental mentions to a slightly more focused coverage (I wasn't able to find an exclusive profile or interview). Here are some examples from books 1 (this is the one mentioned at the article I believe) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. A couple of them are interesting in that their subject is actually a city, and Los Mojarras are mentioned because of a song, like in "This place X is what Los Mojarras were talking about in Y song", which I think reflects a certain level of repercussion. Here are some examples from the first page of Gnews 1 2 3. A quick look to the second page of hits showed more articles available (of a different content). I can't judge the reliability of the sources, but it seems that notability is met overall - frankieMR (talk) 23:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Delete to the fact that this has too many unknown links and I agree with Who needs names?. --Strangeowl1948 (talk) 11:29, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.