Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Sells
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 02:23, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Mark Sells (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources used to write article, none worth using found in a search, although I did get a lot of false positives relating to people named Mark who sold something. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Self-promoting blogger whose commentary is republished in various online faux-newspapers, but his handful of legitimate publication credits are nowhere near enough to demonstrate notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:57, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and hullabaloo. MarkDask 15:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:26, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.