Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolitan Community Churches in London
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) VX!talk 18:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Metropolitan Community Churches in London (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Three-sentence stub about Metropolitan Community Church (MCC) congregations in London. Aside from the historical info, there is a 3-item bullet list including 2 MCC churches in London which have their own articles. Has not expanded past stub level since 2005 & in its present form kind of resembles a disambig page. Propose deletion of article & merge of the 3 sentences into the 2 other MCC congregation articles for London. Outsider80 (talk) 05:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of LGBT related deletions. Outsider80 (talk) 06:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been linked to at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject London. Outsider80 (talk) 06:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
- Keep I think this is a significant group of churches, and the two existing articles on individual churches in the group should be merged in here. We dont usually have articles on individual churches unless of hsstoric significance, which these do not have. DGG (talk) 09:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article could use expanding, but I don't see any reason for its deletion. Pastor Theo (talk) 22:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator withdraws nomination -- No apparent chance of deletion outcome, and the article can be refactored to apply only to the mother church (which would address problem of article looking like a disambig page, and overlapping with articles of the churches which spun-off from it) Outsider80 (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.