Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Teen USA 2004

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 06:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Teen USA 2004 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirects get reverted, and an attempted draftification just got reverted as well. A WP:BEFORE search got other Miss Teen USA beauty pageants, and the current sources are low-quality. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 07:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - how is this a question? All Teen USA articles should be kept and results should obviously be included. I feel like reliable citation is difficult given many of the references pre-date the internet, but we have videos that corroborate the information posted. Notability is not temporary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danitykayne (talkcontribs) 20:37, 15 October 2024 (UTC) strike - confirmed sock of User:Sdfghuij below -- Ponyobons mots 16:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - similar sentiment. The article (and each year's article on the topic) warrant inclusion. The article is suitable as-is. Sdfghuij (talk) 21:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article per Sdfghuij because it is still notable for that article, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Notability (beauty pageant participants). Apipattana (talk) 03:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm changing my mind about this article, instead of keeping the article, but I support the nomination because I think it is also likely fails per WP:SIGCOV and WP:NPOSSIBLE due to lack or fewer of source which is more than 20 years since then.
Apipattana (talk) 10:42, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Apipattana To be clear, you're changing your !vote to delete? I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 12:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because I think the sock puppet user was voted to keep the article, but the expert users says it is not meet per WP:GNG or other Wikipedia policies, I have no choice but I changed my mind to vote to deleting that article per nomination for that. Apipattana (talk) 13:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I mean I'm support to deleting that article. Apipattana (talk) 13:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Apipattana Okay, thanks for clarifying. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 13:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.