Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mugurdy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mugurdy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Too complicated for PROD since there appears to be sourcing, but looking at this one and another it's clear they're all reproductions of the same text, likely issued from the company. I found this but there's no indication that's a reliable source, and can find no evidence this search engine found notability. Thoughts? Star Mississippi 15:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, Internet, and Ireland. Star Mississippi 15:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NWEB, WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. This appears to have been a short-lived website and/or web company. Set up in mid-2009. And defunct by mid-2010. A search in mainstream Irish news sources, like search in the Irish Times and in the Irish Examiner, returns nothing at all. The only material coverage I can find is the "startup is a startup" coverage in tech news sources. And perhaps that "startup is attempting to take on Google" piece in the Sunday Business Post. This type of short-lived coverage does not stand as a reason/justification to have an article covering this failed (non-notable) startup. Doesn't meet any applicable criteria and so mine is a firm "delete" recommendation. Guliolopez (talk) 13:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.