Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mythic Russia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mangojuicetalk 16:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a non-notable game, as far as I can tell. It's self=described as a "standalone" so that seems to influence its impact. I've prodded it twice (one time it was seconded), and the prods have been removed without improvement and without discussion. I'm bringing it to the community for further input. It is unsourced/uncited, so my conclusion is Delete. Akradecki 05:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Jusjih 07:40, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per nom. —dima/s-ko/ 03:09, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. It seems to be widely discussed on the Web: 4000 Google hits for "Mythic Russia" HeroQuest. AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I'm the author, so I'm biased (obviously I'd hope it stays but equally accept the will of the wiki); the only comment I would make is that use if the word 'standalone' is intended simply to note that this is not just a supplement for an existing game, but a game in its own right, albeit using the HeroQuest game engine under license. --Mark Galeotti 14:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for now. It is lacking any independent reviews. I have no problem with it coming back if it proves a success and that can be documented. BlueValour 22:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Fairly notable recent release in the RPG community by a notable RPG author, and the first game apart from HeroQuest to use the HQ system. And incidentally, you shouldn't have prodded it twice. Once a prod has been removed it shouldn't be restored, as clearly stated in WP:PROD. -- Necrothesp 01:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.