Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickelblock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nickelblock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable Chrome/Firefox plugin NtheP (talk) 18:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- weak delete; the plugin has received coverage in New England Herald, at MTV Greece, and at other more minor places, but it tends to be short and the interest seems fleeting. I'm not even sure it's of enough import to bother integrating into the Nickelback article. --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:18, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I wouldn't exactly describe those as brilliant coverage. Please note that I am not a Nickelback fan (can't really see why they're in the 'Metal' section at my local record shop), and I don't find them appearing in my browser. Possibly this is because I use AdBlock Plus and block all the ads anyway, being sensible. It'll be a nine day wonder at the most. Possibly it could even be a publicity stunt be the people who wrote it. (I know I'm cynical... Don't care.) Peridon (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete—mentions in various entertainment/pop culture-esque pages is not enough to garner sufficient notability to pass GNG. —Theopolisme 14:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.