Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacifica Online
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was incubate to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Pacifica Online Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Pacifica Online (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Seems to fail WP:GNG, and the only potentially reliable source I could find was the video of the Homepage TV show. A Google search failed to provide any other reliable sources. Inks.LWC (talk) 21:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Inks.LWC (talk) 21:49, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC (talk) 21:49, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Incubate or userify since it might generate lots of press once released. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter (constabulary) 20:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no significant coverage or claims of notability. MikeWazowski (talk) 03:20, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or possibly incubate. Article's four refs are all primary. Nothing in Metacritic or GameRankings. All the Gnews and general search hits I see are primary, sales sites, directory listings, and press release mirrors. Happy to look again if anyone can find something substantial from an WP:RS site. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:46, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.