Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panarabism and bigotry connection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. After reviewing the discussion referenced by T L Miles, this does qualify for speedy under G4 - recreation of an article deleted pursuant to a deletion discussion. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 16:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Panarabism and bigotry connection

Seems like a huge synthesis of conclusions, and a case of using Wikipedia as a soapbox for an opinion. The title dooms it never to be neutral, more of an essay than an encyclopedia article. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:SYNTHesized essay. JJL (talk) 00:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 00:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 00:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:SYNTH and above. Lets drinkTea 00:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this is a recreation of one of several identical deleted articles created by one of several sock/meatpuppets last year, from this source: /masteringwiki/PanArabism.html See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anti_Jewish_Arabism and Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MarthaFiles T L Miles (talk) 03:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If we could get an admin to look at the deleted article and determine just how similar it is, it may qualify for speedy deletion under criteria G4 Beeblebrox (talk) 03:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are identical (see the lisnk above). This and previous names can never be used for anything but propaganda, and that's a web page advising people on how to recreate this propaganda verbatim. They should be Deleted and Salted and these throwaway usernames should be checked as socks and/or banned. T L Miles (talk) 03:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt The links T L Miles put up are shocking. This is terrible pov pushing. I did some copyedit on the article out of good faith to the editor. I feel like I have been bamboozeled.--Adam in MO Talk 06:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:OR and WP:Synth. --Ged UK (talk) 11:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.