Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyaar Kii Ye Ek Kahaani
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jujutacular talk 20:57, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pyaar Kii Ye Ek Kahaani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be the only contents of this article is the plot. Also, there are no reliable references Hallows AG (talk) 01:22, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Re-write - the article has been badly written, not easily understandable owing to its too long narative without any paragraphing or structured sections.--SubContinentalAnalyst (talk) 09:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There's nothing stopping you from rewriting this without it first being deleted. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione Message 11:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Insufficient content beyond a plot, no reliable references, and being badly written are reasons to improve the article, not to delete it. It seems improvement is already underway. Gnome de plume (talk) 12:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 16:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The article could be improved, but the series' airing on STAR One suggests notability. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.