Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/REC*IT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

REC*IT

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fundamentally a product listing with little evidence of notability. Created by a COI ring related to the software developer's parent company. (See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Antonseidler). Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 12:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:35, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:35, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Offered sources are either not independent or not significant. The Forbes article amounts to two one-sentence paragraphs, for example. Other searches fail to find any significant coverage. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:23, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:28, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.