Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reality on Demand
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –MuZemike 23:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Reality on Demand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Submitting this one on account of WP:TOOSOON here. Hate to say this, but the series has no base of notability yet, and the sources include an IMDB entry, the show's webpage, another site with a trailer, and that's about it. It sounds like fun, but on account of WP:ILIKEIT, it shouldn't yet be here in this editor's opinion. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, I've added three news stories that talk about the show as references if that helps any. User:GenreGuru — Preceding unsigned comment added by GenreGuru (talk • contribs) 23:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please review our reliable sources guidelines, as well as our general notability guidelines. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Must agree with Dennis here, as WP:ILIKEIT rules the day... today. Perhaps notability will be established in February/March, once the thing premieres, or later, should one of the principals themselves become notable. --Seduisant (talk) 01:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:TOOSOON, WP:GNG, and WP:ADVERTISING. References are not independent third-parties that establish notability. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 02:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.