Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schilberg (Echt)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 11:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Schilberg (Echt) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to satisfy WP:GEOLAND and has no WP:SIGCOV to demonstrate notability. – Meena • 08:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. – Meena • 08:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I have added two more references and de-orphaned the page. Schilberg has non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Its identity as a hamlet-turned-neighbourhood is mainly because it is a pilgrimage site for Our Lady of Schilberg.Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 00:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The status is somewhat unclear. It is an official entity in the statistics and has quite a decent population, but seems to have been swallowed up by Pey for quite a long time now. As stated by Ruud Buitelaar, it is a pilgrimage site with significant coverage.KittenKlub (talk) 12:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Does appear to have once been a separate village, so meets WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Enwiki has no rule against sources in foreign languages. This nomination seems totally random. gidonb (talk) 10:49, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.