Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean weathers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:V: unverifiable: only sources I can find are myspace pages. If the movies have been made, they seem to have had no impact at all, in which case he fails WP:BIO. Fram 09:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No verifiable notability. JPD (talk) 10:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom although if it included links to his films i'd be partially interested. Also; the article has been created and maintained by his friend/colleague, which is not a good thing. Onebravemonkey 11:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. 231 ghits. MER-C 13:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Only 41 of those Google hits are unique, too... -- Scientizzle 17:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I proded this yesterday because it was completely unsourced (failing WP:V) and contained only dubious claims of notability (failing WP:BIO). It's also quite POV, probably because User:Aswadissa is the same Aswad Issa that works in the same production company as Weathers; WP:VAIN may apply here. -- Scientizzle 17:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete only assertion of notability is clearly waaaaay exagerated. Pascal.Tesson 21:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I changed up the arcticle to tone certain things down. Bear in mind, he is an UNDERGROUND film maker, so most of you may have never heard of him. But his films are very popular in the NYC UNDERGROUND film world.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aswadissa (talk • contribs) .
- The article's claims are still not verifiably supported by any reliable sources. Notability has been asserted, but not established. -- Scientizzle 23:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sean definitely has name recognition within the underground film community in NYC. Google searches are not going to reveal much, if anything, about his works. What do you need me to do to "establish" his notability to your liking?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aswadissa (talk • contribs) .
- Well, have you read WP:BIO? It gives a lot of examples of ways a biography can demonstrate notability...For starters, is there any non-trivial media coverage? (Also, do not change others' votes as you did to Pascal.Tesson.) -- Scientizzle 04:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article's claims are still not verifiably supported by any reliable sources. Notability has been asserted, but not established. -- Scientizzle 23:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.