Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sepideh Jodeyri
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion to run until at least 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sepideh Jodeyri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO, although as sources are unlikely to be English I stand to be corrected. Stifle (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article has verifiable references to sources giving issue and page numbers. There is no requirement for sources to be available online, so unless someone has checked these and found them not to support the article content the presumption should be in favour of keeping. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for now. Maybe direct the creator to WP:FEED? Without titles for the books, it is difficult to search for sources (in English), but assuming the sources given are true, then she has at least one book of poetry with significant coverage. To avoid systemic bias, articles on non-western topics clearly written by new foreign contributors should be given help before AfD, imo.Yobmod (talk) 10:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.