Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skappelnabben Spur
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 02:46, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Skappelnabben Spur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Pyraminxsolver (talk) 05:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: This AfD was listed in February and never seems to have made it to a daily logpage. Formatting and relisting now. jp×g 03:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp×g 04:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The current article comprises only the text that appears in the SCAR Composite Gazetteer of Antarctica [1]. I'd agree it isn't notable. There is an article for the expedition, and Wikipedia can't include every place named during it. (This is my first involvement in a discussion so hope this comment is formated ok) Buckland1072 (talk) 20:55, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ "SCAR Composite Gazetteer of Antarctica". Australian Antarctic Division. Retrieved 8 July 2022.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.