Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Man from Ruin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 01:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Man from Ruin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, no reliable secondary coverage, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 12:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice to recreation if/when sourcing proving notability per WP:NFILM become available. For the purpose of the article creator, notability giving reliable sources would be things like newspaper articles, reviews in places like Twitch Film, and the like. Routine notifications of events, brief WP:TRIVIAL mentions, WP:PRIMARY sources, or listings in databases like IMDb would not be usable to show notability and in the case of IMDb, the site isn't considered a WP:RS on Wikipedia since it can be relatively easily edited by anyone. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:40, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the sources say it all and, along with that, there's still nothing else convincing for the independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.