Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TiGER-M@TE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TiGER-M@TE

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, looking at the sources (all claimed to be from Shadhin, nearly identical to the author Shadhin72) utterly unreliable and this failing WP:BLP The Banner talk 21:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Articles aren't from Shadhin, but from different authors. The claim of Guinness World Record is a boast by Tiger Mate and not from a source. There are refs from some reliable sources, which partially back up claims in the article. Problem being Tiger Mate didn't actually hack the sites mentioned, only DNS servers. Hacking Google and hacking some ISP's DNS server are two different things. There are also no reliable refs that go into any detail about Tiger Mate. Bgwhite (talk) 06:42, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources mention him by name as one who "hacked" various sites, but no substantive detail about him, even as the pseudonym. Seems rather analogous to a band article having several sources that just announce a band is playing somewhere. Crow^Caw 19:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as my searches found nothing good aside from here and here and there's not much for more here. He's mentioned at List of hackers and this would be best mentioned somewhere else but that's only linking article. SwisterTwister talk 02:36, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.