Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toa Inika/Toa Mahri
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Toa Inika/Toa Mahri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Original research plot summary about non-notable characters. No real world context and only sources are someones blog. Ridernyc (talk) 07:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fictional characters with no notability outside of the Bionicle universe. Fails WP:FICTION. Lankiveil (talk) 09:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete per Lankiveil. While article has sources, they're from discussion forums (from what I can tell, links aren't reliable). Phyesalis (talk) 22:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Gavin Collins (talk) 10:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails WP:NOT#PLOT and WP:WAF. There are no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bold textKeep. Could someone tell me why EVERY SINGLE fictional(specifically bionicle)article HAS to be deleted?Oh, and "someones" blog is official.
- Keep While sources are from discussion forums, the information referenced is from the series writer's posts only.
- in other words a primary source. Ridernyc (talk) 20:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.