Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touch cup
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 07:15, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We should delete this. I do not know what it is, so we must therefore omit it from the fountain of knowledge. It is a prerequisite that I personally am an expert on a subject matter before I agree to include it on this website...Djcartwright 02:32, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No, we don't. There should be a speedy category for "drinking games, gaming clans, micronations, and fake religions." Delete. NawlinWiki 02:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, we do. It's not a local pastime, it's a national student activity and deserves to be documented!User:pompeymat
- Delete, then drink a shot. eaolson 02:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per NawlinWiki. ~ trialsanderrors 02:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep I have actually heard of this before. While it may not be perfectly appropriate for Wikipedia, based on other articles, I would have to say it should stay. --Mysmartmouth 03:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was in the middle of prodding this when it was AfD'd. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Opabinia regalis 03:42, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unverifiable, made up in school one day, dictionary definition, non-notable neologism, etc etc. -- IslaySolomon 04:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above.UberCryxic 22:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. RFerreira 23:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable unless good, verifiable references meeting WP:RS are produced prior to expiration of comment period. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.