Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasant Abaji Dahake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Monty ₈₄₅ 02:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vasant Abaji Dahake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable poet. Fails WP:BIO. No multiple independent references.Most of the references incluse poems of the poet rather than third party reliable references. Unless there is multiple independent references regarding a person it fails to be notable in wikipedia

Weak keep His Sahitya Akademi award is verifiable and, while Google Books shows little in the way of secondary reliable sources, there seem to be enough reliable tertiary hits that I would be surprised if there weren't suitable sources available in Marathi. PWilkinson (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sahitya Akademi is a major Indian award. So it should be must keep.--Nidhi. mehta333 (talk) 12:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The Sahitya Akademi award easily satisfies WP:ANYBIO. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:01, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sahitya akademi award is highest official literary award in india. any recipient would automatically meet WP:ANYBIO--Sodabottle (talk) 05:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.